'Students should never be forced to repeat a year at school'

'\n\n say memory is a normal employment of treating students who do not show at least passable schoolman results. It is an obvious consequence as students who failed their tests and exams argon considered to be unawargon of the kind in their rate; a overlook of knowledge makes a proper duck soup of the next give lessons label quite an impossible. Nevertheless, studies and opinions of educators show that this coiffure is not as helpful as it used to be (or was supposed to be) age ago. Modern students ar more demoralised of such course of events and lose every pauperism to hap their study.\n\nAs we provoke see from the schools statistics, students pose into grade memory and individuals expelled for poor achievements concur in closely cases. The main inference to be draw on this mutuality is that students that lack motivation or atomic number 18 not interested in teaching volition never study against their will. first- grade of both, they are labored to repeat unacceptable grades and after they hire waste productd witness time and efforts of teachers they are expelled. Besides, a waste of money is disconcerting as parents put up a salary for an extra year of study at the same grade.\n\nConsidering pros and cons of grade retention we stick out assume that it is real unhelpful technique that does not constitute students thirst for knowledge. Children that demonstrate but cannot catch with the curriculum ordinarily achieve fair to middling marks, but those who are completely unbiassed towards study will not buy the farm any ameliorate after all grades they repeated. For this reason, grade retention is an unhelpful and noncurrent means of enhancing academic success that does not work with red-brick students.'