Aristotle Essay example -- essays research papers

y does Plato believe that only Philosophers are fit to convention?Rather than the practical pursuit we are accustomed to, for Plato, Politics is an quick-witted faculty. Governance by non-philosophers is to be governed by opinions, touchs and self-interest in demarcation the philosopher ruler lead govern with virtue and justice with no secret agenda. The philosopher is in love, in love with learning, acquaintance and truth. It is important to make a distinction here between the acquisition of knowledge and the acquisition of truth, beca employ knowledge is non necessarily the truth. With the help of an allegory, Plato explains the sensible world of illusion and belief, the take aim where nigh people reside. The philosopher has stepped outside this world, into a world of knowledge and truth. Plato makes use of a cave to explain this I will use some other means. A child believes in the myth of Santa Claus, a child has substantially reason to suppose this myth is true, it is inculcated when he receives Christmas presents, the media, family and friends consolidate the belief, the child even writes to Santa Claus and receives a reply. On Christmas Day this belief becomes a reality. by dint of education and maturity, the child will have doubts as to the truth of this illusion. At some stage during the transition from childhood to adulthood he will acknowledge the illusion, and further, during parenthood the myth really comes home to roost as knowledge and absolute truth. (He now has a choice he ass put an end to the myth or continue the cycle) What is distinctive regarding individually stage, is how far they have come out of the cave. Through illusion and belief to knowledge, or from artisan to auxiliary to philosopher. The fundamental prerequisite to becoming a philosopher ruler is to have knowledge of the forms, therefore knowing the truth. The forms do not exist in the sensible world, they can only be lay down in the super-sensible world. Platos th eory of the forms is classly logical and neighborhoodly metaphysical. The logical part is, take for example a dog, there will be umpteen types of dog, and general particulars regarding a dog. The form of a dog is universal and perfect(a) it has no position in space or time, it is not innate(p) when a dog is born, nor does it die when a dog dies. The metaphysical part of the theory is the form of a dog is a perfect, unique dog, created by God. The dog is real, pa... ...ft of the preeminently "excellent" citizen to protect the states constitution by making him the ruler of the state. Aristotle further justifies his position by stating that a citizen should not be made the ruler of a state because of his wealth or his ancestry. Unless by some chance wealth or ancestry affects the ability of a citizen to accomplishment towards the interests of the constitution. Of course the wealthy citizens and those citizens of glamorous ancestry should not be denied the chance to rule t he state, for the ruler should be chosen for his "excellence" alone. pull down in modern democracies like our own Aristotles ideas hold true. When we vote in the election of the ruler of our country we, theoretically, are voting for the single most "excellent" citizen of our nation. That is we are voting for that citizen who can do the best pipeline of working(a) towards our common interests. The citizen of a state who has the greatest ability to work towards the salvation of the constitution has a gift that all citizens can eudaimonia from. It only makes sense to beseech that citizen to lead the rest of the citizens in working towards the common interests of the state.